Green forum seeks removal of Forest Minister’s Additional Private Secretary

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.

First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.

Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.

Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers

Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there

The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.

Coexistence Collective, Kerala, a broad coalition of environmental organisations, wildlife conservationists, researchers, scientists and civil society groups, has demanded the removal of Sijumon Francis from the post of Additional Private Secretary in the Forest Minister’s office.

In memorandums submitted to the Chief Minister and the Forest Minister, the collective expressed concern over the appointment. It alleged that Mr. Francis had been involved in protests and campaigns against the Forest department and its policies for several years and feared that the appointment could affect the neutrality of Kerala’s forest and environmental governance system and undermine public confidence.

It is claimed that Mr. Francis had organised protests and mobilised public opposition against the State government and the Forest department on various issues, including buffer zones and forest boundary demarcation. He had also challenged the department positions through legal proceedings, including against the official stance regarding the proposed road development of the Neriamangalam–Valara stretch of the Kochi–Dhanushkodi National Highway 85.

Besides, during his tenure as Ernakulam district president of the Kerala Independent Farmers’ Association, and later through the Farmers’ Awareness Revival Movement, Mr. Francis had allegedly opposed the Forest department on matters related to forest conservation, buffer zones, forest boundary demarcation, wildlife management and forest governance.

Environmentalists said the appointment placed him within a strategic position in the same administrative system he had opposed.

The collective also stated that several environmental, forest and wildlife-related issues concerning the high ranges were at present being considered by courts, tribunals, and other legal bodies. It cautioned that appointing a person, who had allegedly taken positions contrary to forest and wildlife conservation, could be viewed as part of an effort to undermine such proceedings. Th