Choose between Abhishek and me: Kalyan Banerjee issues ultimatum to Mamata

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.

First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.

Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.

Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers

Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there

The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.

File photo of Trinamool Congress MP and senior advocate Kalyan Banerjee. | Photo Credit: ANI

Senior Trinamool Congress leader and Lok Sabha MP Kalyan Banerjee on Thursday (June 11, 2026) issued an ultimatum to its supremo Mamata Banerjee to choose between her nephew Abhishek Banerjee and veterans like him, accusing the party national general secretary of “arrogance and fluctuating mindset”.

Mr. Kalyan, also a senior advocate, declared he would remove himself from all legal matters and court petitions concerning Mr. Abhishek, although the MP said he would continue contesting cases related to the Trinamool party.

The rift between the two leaders came to a tipping point after Mr. Kalyan — who had been representing Mr. Abhishek in the Calcutta High Court in a signature forgery case of the CID — was allegedly informed that a separate writ petition was filed by the Diamond Harbour MP with regard to the search operations conducted by the agency at the Trinamool office at Mamata Banerjee’s Kalighat residence and Abhishek’s Camac Street office.

“The two cases are connected, and I had mentioned the search operation issue before the Bench who was hearing the signature forgery matter. The judge had listed the matter to be heard on Thursday. Later, some emissaries of Abhishek came to me to say that a separate writ has been filed on the CID raid issue. I was taken aback since I had no knowledge of it,” Mr. Kalyan told reporters.

The advocate alleged that when he asked why he was not taken into confidence, they told him that it was done “on directions from the top”.

“Had I known about this, I would not have mentioned the matter before the judge because two separate Benches cannot hear the same matter. Abhishek has many advisors, and so I have told the party I would not represent him in any court cases in future, as it is impossible to deal with such arrogance and fluctuating mindset. I was later informed that a junior lawyer would contest his cases,” Mr. Kalyan said.

The Lok Sabha MP fro