Нова реформа армії: сигнал владі для тих, хто служить роками?

The author expresses concern that the announced army reform is addressing superficial issues rather than fundamental problems, suggesting a focus on increased pay for infantry as a solution to recruitment challenges. The piece argues that financial incentives alone do not address the core reasons for service reluctance, pointing out that high payments are often tied to active frontline duty, with significantly lower basic pay upon leave, injury, or transfer. A major issue highlighted is the lack of clarity regarding service duration and the perceived unfairness towards those who serve diligently. The reform is criticized for potentially offering better conditions to those who join later, while long-serving soldiers, especially those who joined during difficult times like 2022 or the Anti-Terrorist Operation (ATO), are overlooked. The author also questions the disparity in financial compensation across different military roles, arguing that all service is valuable and that creating a gap in pay devalues certain positions. The reform's focus on attracting new personnel, while neglecting current service members who have sacrificed civilian careers and personal lives, is also a point of criticism. Fair compensation is presented not as a privilege but as a necessary acknowledgment of lost time and opportunities.

This article critically analyzes a new military reform, questioning its effectiveness and fairness towards long-serving soldiers.