Grok helped strike 2,000 targets at Iran. Now its pollution is ‘national security’.

The Pentagon says Grok helped strike 2,000 targets in 96 hours, and that the polluting power plant behind it is a matter of paramount national security. The two claims belong in the same sentence, and that is the problem.

The admission did not come in a press release or a Pentagon briefing, it came in a statement filed in a federal courthouse in Mississippi, in a case about air pollution. There, defending Elon Musk’s xAI against a Clean Air Act lawsuit, the Pentagon’s chief digital and artificial intelligence officer set down a sentence that ought to stop anyone reading it cold.

The chatbot known as Grok, he wrote, had helped fire more than 2,000 munitions at 2,000 distinct targets in Iran within 96 hours, and its continued operation was a matter of paramount national security.

Read that again, because the venue is the whole story. A government official disclosed that a consumer AI product had been used to bomb a country, not in order to inform the public, but in order to keep a data centre running. The targeting and the turbines arrived in the same affidavit because, in the administration’s telling, they are the same argument: Grok matters to the war, the war matters to the nation, therefore the power plant that feeds Grok cannot be turned off, whatever the law says about its permits.

A workspace designed for growth, collaboration, and endless networking opportunities in the heart of tech.

This is the moment the two problems with military AI stop being separate. The first is that a chatbot built to answer questions on a social network is now wired into the machinery that kills people. The second is that the man who owns that chatbot also sits inside the government deciding how it gets used. Each is alarming on its own.

Together they describe a system in which the safeguards we would normally expect, legal, environmental, ethical, all bend toward the convenience of one company and one man.

Start with the chatbot. Grok is, according to the filing, one of only four AI models the Pentagon considers capable of supporting national-security applications, and one of three cleared for mission-critical work in top-secret settings.

It feeds into the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s Maven Smart System, the AI-driven dashboard that lays out intelligence data to help officials decide what to strike. The official line is reassuring in its phrasing: the AI does not create targets, it identifies points of interest for human analysts to weigh. The humans, we are told, remain in the loop.

The loop did not save the children of Minab. On 28 February, in th