Need to protect forests across country: SC

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.

First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.

Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.

Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers

Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there

The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.

Image used for representational purpose only. | Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStock

The Supreme Court on Thursday (June 18, 2026) said there was a need to protect forests across India, noting that some States like Jharkhand have natural ecosystems which must be preserved.

The observations came from a Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice V. Mohana which was hearing a plea filed by the Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board (JSPCB).

“There are few States where we can really protect our natural ecosystem and you (Jharkhand) are one of them,” the CJI told the counsel appearing for JSPCB.

The Bench observed that some of the States have natural paradises like forests and they need to be protected.

The top court was hearing a petition challenging an order of the Jharkhand High Court. The high court had in April passed directions relating to consent for stone mining or establishing stone crushers from the boundaries of forests or forest land.

In January, the high court had directed that no consent should be granted for stone mining or stone crushers within one kilometre measured from the demarcated boundaries of protected forests within the State.

The high court had passed the order in January while hearing a petition challenging a notification issued by JSPCB, which reduces the minimum distance for setting up stone mines and stone crushers around forest or forest land from the previously notified 400-500 metres to 250 metres.

In its April order, the high court had said the restriction on the grant of consents would apply to the zone of 500 metres from the boundaries of forests or forest land insofar as stone mining was concerned, and to the zone of 400 metres insofar as stone crushers were concerned.

During the hearing on Thursday, the top court observed the authority had abruptly reduced the distance.

The counsel appearing for JSPCB referred to the observations made by the high court and said everything was stalled.

The Bench said the high court was seized of the mat