Centre committed not to ask for further 'sacrifices' after freeze on provinces' development funds: Bilawal

PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari said on Thursday that the federal government had promised that allocations for provinces under the 7th National Finance Commission (NFC) award would be “protected”, and that the Centre would not request any further “help or sacrifice” following the recent decision to freeze development allocations for the provinces. Bilawal joined the budget debate a day after he held a meeting with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who is reported to have convinced the head of his coalition partner PPP to attend the budget session in the NA. “The provinces’ NFC award and financial resources have been kept protected; no damage will be caused to them,” Bilawal declared while addressing the NA, which was debating the proposed federal budget for the next fiscal year (FY27). “Besides this decision, the provincial governments will not be required to make any sacrifices,” he added. The government has decided to freeze development allocations for the provinces for three years to generate more than Rs900 billion in additional resources for the Centre’s strategic needs. Referring to this decision, Bilawal said that the Centre and provinces had decided to jointly bear the burden of “extraordinary needs pertaining to defence and national security”. He affirmed that “we came up with such a constitutional and democratic solution which meets the national security needs and also minimises complaints from the provinces”. The PPP chairman emphasised that the decision was not taken unconstitutionally but rather under Article 164 of the Constitution. “The Constitution enables that if the provinces and the federal government have to spend on a subject which does not fall under their domain, under the article, provinces can give grants to the Centre or the Centre can give grants to the provinces,” he explained. He thanked Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Deputy PM Ishaq Dar and Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb for remaining engaged with PPP representatives and finding a constitutional and democratic solution. “This is not just a financial or administrative [success], but the success of Pakistan’s politics. It is proof that when national interest is at stake, then democratic institutions, political parties, and all parts of the federation can make decisions together,” Bilawal said. He underscored the significance of the consensus reached on the development allocations at a time when “the India-Israel nexus wants to harm Pakistan in every way, [such as] terrorism and our issues with Afghanistan”. Bilawal also welcomed the opposition PTI for “keeping aside its politics”, noting that the decision was made not just by the parties in the ruling coalition but also by the PTI-ruled Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. “If PTI and our opposition allies adopted similar politics, where there could be political differences […] but we work together like this in national interest, then there is no issue that we cannot face,” he remarked. However, during his speech, Bilawal termed such temporary moves as “non-sustainable solutions”. He called for the federal and provincial governments to chart out a long-term, sustainable plan and introduce “growth-oriented economic policies”. On Tuesday, the PPP chief warned of the NA session’s boycott if their demands remained unmet. A source said Bilawal appeared upset with the budget, stating that it was different from the document shared with the PPP. During Wednesday’s meeting at the PM House, the premier agreed to address all the PPP concerns regarding the federal budget. The PPP chairperson was also initially reluctant to join the NA session where the FY27 budget was presented. It had taken Deputy PM Dar and Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi to convince him to come to the house so that the budget could be tabled. ‘No province given its due share’ The PPP chairman also took note of “strange rumours” circulating before the budget was debated in the parliament, including the abolishment of the 18th Amendment and changes in the NFC award. He further noted that there had been an impression that “the provinces have fiscal space after the 18th Amendment and the NFC and that the federal government does not”. He stressed that although the Centre may have economic challenges, so do all the provinces. “While it is true that the NFC and 18th Amendment were historic and constitutional achievements, it is also true that despite these, no province has been given its due share,” the Bhutto scion asserted. Bilawal recalled that the petroleum development levy (PDL) had been temporarily introduced to help the country deal with the floods during the previous PPP government. Noting that it was still being collected, he contended that it was in violation of the NFC award and the 18th Amendment. “Instead of distributing the petroleum levy among the Centre and the provinces under the NFC formula, the Centre retains 100 per cen