Intelligence Agency Accused of Intimidation: ANB Claims Legal Protection for Reporting Sources
Iz tajne službe kažu da Janovićeva krivična prijava nije stvaranje opasnog presedana, pozivajući se na Zakon o ANB-u Šef ANB-a na ovaj način, očigledno, osim što vrši pritisak na medije, pokušava i da zastraši svoje zaposlene, kaže Milena Perović Evropski sud za ljudska prava 1996. utvrdio da je zaštita novinarskih izvora jedan od osnovnih uslova slobode medija
Montenegro's intelligence agency, ANB, asserts that a criminal complaint filed by its chief, referred to as Janović, is not setting a dangerous precedent. The ANB claims the action is in line with the Law on the National Security Agency. However, critics, including Milena Perović, argue that this move constitutes an attempt to intimidate the media and silence whistleblowers. Perović suggests the chief is trying to deter employees from revealing information. The European Court of Human Rights has previously established that protecting journalistic sources is fundamental to media freedom. This case raises concerns about potential government overreach and suppression of press freedom. The ANB's stance is being scrutinized for its implications on transparency and accountability. The situation highlights a tension between national security interests and the public's right to information.
The ANB's legal action against reporting sources raises concerns about press freedom and potential intimidation, challenging the fundamental right to protect journalistic information.
📌 Kaynak
Bu haber XML kaynağından derlenmiştir. Tamamı için orijinal habere gidin.
Orijinal haberi oku →