MPs debate if Keir Starmer should face inquiry into whether he misled them over Mandelson vetting – UK politics live

Members of Parliament are currently debating whether Keir Starmer should face an inquiry regarding claims he misled the House of Commons. The debate stems from testimony given to a committee by Morgan McSweeney, who stated that advising the Prime Minister on Peter Mandelson's appointment was a "serious error of judgment." McSweeney's account suggests there was pressure regarding Mandelson's vetting process, contradicting earlier statements. However, a former permanent undersecretary indicated they were unaware of any specific pressure related to Mandelson's case during their tenure and could not recall McSweeney making such claims in meetings.

This situation is significant as it concerns potential misleading of Parliament and the integrity of the vetting process for high-profile political appointments.