Anthropic launches Claude Sonnet 5 as a cheaper way to run agents

As shipping agentic capabilities becomes table stakes among foundation model companies, Anthropic is releasing Claude Sonnet 5, a more powerful and agentic version of the lab’s midsize model.

“It can make plans, use tools like browsers and terminals, and run autonomously at a level that, just a few months ago, required larger and more expensive models,” Anthropic said in a blog post.

That framing mirrors what OpenAI and Google have said about their own recent releases. OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol was launched in preview last week, and it is also the firm’s most agentic model yet, allowing users to split work across subagents for longer autonomous tasks. Google’s Gemini 3.5 Flash, which launched in May, was pitched as a shift from a conversational chatbot to an agentic tool that plans, builds, and iterates on real work with minimal human input.

Sonnet 5’s pitch is confirmation that agentic capability is the new baseline expectation at every price tier. Now the differentiator isn’t going to be who can do agentic work best, but how cheaply they can do it and how reliably without human oversight.

Sonnet 5 promises performance close to that of Opus 4.8, but for much lower costs. Starting Tuesday, Claude Sonnet 5 will be the default model for free and Pro plans and is available for every subscription.

At launch, Sonnet 5 is priced at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens through August 31, after which the price will jump to $3 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. That makes Sonnet 5 cheaper than Opus 4.8, as well as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 and Google’s Gemini 3.1 Pro. (It’s still more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash.)

The new model also demonstrates significant improvements over its predecessor Sonnet 4.6, released in February, on agentic performance like reasoning, tool use, software coding, and knowledge work, according to Anthropic.

For example, on one benchmark, Sonnet 5 scores a 63.2% on agentic coding, compared to Opus 4.8’s 69.2% and Sonnet 4.6’s 58.1%. On a knowledge work benchmark, Sonnet 5 actually slightly outperforms Opus 4.8, which is known for winning on solving the hardest problems like making subtle judgment calls and deep research.

“Opus 4.8 is still the model of choice for higher accuracy on these tasks, but Sonnet 5 provides developers with lower-priced options that are of much higher quality than what was previously available,” Anthropic says. “Between Sonnet 5 and Opus 4.8, users can adjust the effort level to find the right balance of cost and performance.”

According to testers cited in the blog p