NDC defends party primaries, denies imposing candidates

The leadership of the Nigeria Democratic Congress has dismissed allegations that its recently concluded presidential, National Assembly, governorship and state Houses of Assembly primaries were marred by irregularities and the imposition of candidates. In a statement issued in Abuja on Thursday, the NDC National Secretary, Morgan Enekweizu, said criticisms of the primaries stemmed from ignorance of the party’s constitution and guidelines, as well as deliberate attempts to undermine the party’s growing influence. According to him, the party should instead be commended for adopting a consensus-driven approach aimed at reducing disputes and fostering unity among members. He said, “The NDC, the fastest-growing political party in Nigeria, is founded on the principles of leadership, consultation, inclusiveness, and consensus-building.” Enekweizu cited the South-East as an example, noting that the party’s approach in the region had been particularly effective despite claims to the contrary. “In the South-East geopolitical zone, our presidential candidate, His Excellency Peter Obi, came into the party with an established leadership structure comprising respected elder statesmen and political leaders who serve as caucus heads in their respective states. “They include former Chairman of the NDDC Board, Chief Onyema Ugochukwu (Abia); ex-Ebonyi State Governor, former minister and senator, Dr Sam Egwu; former PDP National Chairman and former Enugu State Governor, Dr Okwesilieze Nwodo; former Imo State Governor, Chief Achike Udenwa; and Obi’s team, which coordinates the process in his home state of Anambra,” he said. The NDC secretary explained that the caucus leaders were mandated to conduct consultations, build consensus and make recommendations based on the political realities in their states. He added that aspirants who disagreed with recommendations made by stakeholders or caucus leaders were given the opportunity to test their popularity through the democratic process. “In addition, each state has recognised stakeholders and grassroots leaders who participate in consultations and make recommendations regarding party affairs. “This process was conducted without prejudice to the rights of any aspirant. Where aspirants disagreed with recommendations made by stakeholders or caucus leaders, they were free to test their popularity through the democratic process at the grassroots level, and this was duly accommodated. Related News PDP constitutes appeal panels for primary election disputes APC pledges issue-based campaigns ahead of Ekiti, Osun polls Court affirms Agada