‘Mollywood Times’ movie review: A flawed, bloated exposé of the industry’s dark underbelly
Marketed as a “hate letter to cinema,” ‘Mollywood Times’ explores themes of ambition and disillusionment, but struggles with pacing and uneven writing that detract from its potential impact
Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription
The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.
First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.
Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.
Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers
Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there
The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.
A still from ‘Mollywood Times’ | Photo Credit: Sony Music Malayalam/YouTube
A minor act of revolt can be your undoing in the film industry, where power centres are not very tolerant of those who do not fall in line. Vineeth Madhavan (Naslen), the filmmaker protagonist of Mollywood Times, goes the whole hog in his attempt to make his first film without any compromises, a film he wants to be remembered forever. In the process, we see his worldview transform from optimistic to cynical.
Scene after scene seethes with the anger and frustration of someone who experiences his dream slipping away from grasp for no fault of his, so much so that one begins to wonder how much of the events in the film have been drawn from the life of its filmmaker, Abhinav Sunder Nayak. At least, much of the cynicism of his superb debut film, Mukundan Unni Associates, is very much visible here too.
In this world filled with fake smiles, selfish interests and ulterior motives, Vineeth is almost a lonely warrior for his vision, with his passion for the art almost consuming him. Conveniently, the characters are written in a way that there is not a single trustworthy soul around him. Sometimes, Vineeth radiates a mild superiority complex, especially in how the other successful filmmakers are even made to gloat to him of their success despite their mediocrity.
Although the struggles of an aspiring filmmaker in a cutthroat industry make one want to root for Vineeth, he also carries the vibes of Howard Roark, the problematic protagonist of Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead, in his uncompromising and obsessive nature. If the architect Roark blows up a building because it was against his vision, Vineeth here deletes a film he created. Filmmaking, in his worldview, is an individualistic pursuit, with Vineeth having lines that downplay the efforts of every other crew member other than the writer-director.
Some of the other ideas also do not sit well with the film’s theme, especially the protagonist’s claim that some fi
📌 Kaynak
Bu özet The Hindu (IN) kaynağından otomatik derlenmiştir. Tamamı için orijinal habere gidin.
Orijinal haberi oku →