Why did ED, CBI fail to raise red flags over alleged irregularities of Rajesh Exports, asks Congress

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

The View From India Looking at World Affairs from the Indian perspective.

First Day First Show News and reviews from the world of cinema and streaming.

Today's Cache Your download of the top 5 technology stories of the day.

Data Point Decoding the headlines with facts, figures, and numbers

Health Matters Ramya Kannan writes to you on getting to good health, and staying there

The Hindu On Books Books of the week, reviews, excerpts, new titles and features.

Congress Leader Pawan Khera addresses a press conference at AICC office in New Delhi. | Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap

The Congress on Friday (June 5, 2026) questioned why economic offences investigating agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) among others failed to act over alleged financial irregularities at Rajesh Exports, a jewellery company, after interim findings by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) pointed to one of the biggest case of financial misrepresentation in India’s corporate history.

Addressing a press conference, Congress media and publicity department chairman Pawan Khera said the findings exposed not only irregularities in reported revenues of about ₹15.15 lakh crore but exposed serious weaknesses in the government’s regulatory oversight. It reflected the dangers of a “crony capitalist model”, Mr. Khera added.

Calling the findings a “damning indictment” of the government’s regulatory architecture, Mr. Khera questioned why agencies such as the ED, SFIO, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) had failed to act despite the scale of the alleged irregularities.

“Why did the ED that works 24x7 against Opposition not raise any red flag?” Mr. Khera asked. He also wondered why SEBI took seven months to act on a complaint.

Citing the regulator’s interim order, Mr. Khera said 97% to 99% of the company’s reported revenues during the period originated from overseas subsidiaries and step-down subsidiaries.

He added that SEBI’s probe focused on Valcambi SA, described by Rajesh Exports as its principal operating business, and had found significant discrepancies between revenues reported by the subsidiary and those reflected in the group’s consolidated accounts.

Mr. Khera further claimed that SEBI investigators and forensic auditors were denied full access to transaction records, customer and supplier data, inventory details and other key docume